REBUTTAL TO COMPANY RESPONSE: Rob and Chris, Please accept this as written confirmation of the breach and failure of performance relative to the contract we entered regarding painting of the interior and the exterior of my residence. Additionally, please also accept this as a demand for the refund of the deposit under the agreement relative to painting the interior of my residence, in that Rob advised of rescission of the agreement relative to the same, a position which I accepted in writing. That being the case, please refund the related $200.00 deposit immediately. Regarding performance, the work done on the exterior of my residence lacked quality workmanship and appropriate attention to detail. Please know that I relied on Chris’ representations and assurances, apparently to my detriment, on Angie’s List and the other list I used to select your company. As such, I will have no alternative but to provide honest feedback on the Lists, so as not to contribute to the potential detriment to List users and other citizens seeking quality, and professional painting services. As earlier shared orally and in writing to Rob regarding the failure to perform the exterior painting in a workmanlike and quality manner, please consider the following: • Your painters did not use two coats of Sherwin Williams Duration as agreed in the contract. Instead; instead at least one coat of Sherwin Williams SuperPaint was used, and, presumably, for the remainder of the job. It is, indeed noteworthy that it was only after I complained in an email to Rob that Rob appeared with one (1) can of Sherwin Williams Duration. This was not consistent with the terms of our contractual agreement and a strong indication of your breach of our contractual agreement. o Further, by your painters purchasing single gallon buckets of Sherwin Williams SuperPaint white paint, as opposed to a five gallon bucket of Sherwin Williams SuperPaint/Duration strongly suggests that the mildew additive was not included in the Sherwin Williams SuperPaint or the Duration because you would not be able to return unused paint with additive. o It is, indeed, questionable whether two coats of paint was applied in less than eight (8) hours. It rained 30 minutes after the painters finished that day. • When asked about their work orders, the painters told me they were only instructed to paint the house with no other details. This provides further confirmation of the lack of workmanlike performance on the contract, in view of the apparent lack of supervision on the job. According to your painters, specific work instructions had not been provided consistent with our contractual agreement. The failure of adequate supervision of the job also involved other instances, including painting the shutters, and old cream paint bleeding through the new white paint two days post-painting. o When the second group of painters were painting (Caesar & his painters), I tried to point out to Rob places the painters had missed and/or the old paint was bleeding through the new white paint. Rob acted as if he did not see the differences. I had to get on a ladder to prove that the old cream color paint was bleeding through the new white paint. It’s noteworthy that your painters saw the problem. o Dripped paint on my lawn (grass), lawn mower, driveway, hedges; broke hedges with ladders and etc. • Rob seemed more concerned about receiving money for the next phases of the job than ensuring the clarity and specificity of interior painting details (such as quality of paint, color matching of existing paint in home) or ensuring a quality professional painting job. When I provided some of my requirements, Rob terminated our contract relative to the interior painting. o I accepted your termination of the contract and requested refund of the portion of the first down payment, which represented a $200.00 deposit on the interior painting. Rob insisted that the $200.00 was for “extras” which was untrue and, indeed, not noted in our agreement, albeit a document that you prepared or an addendum to the same. o Notably, Rob ultimately advised that the check was in the mail—another obvious fabrication, as I continue to await receipt of the $200.00 refund. Please be advised that the foregoing is simply a snapshot of the errors and omissions attendant to your work—or lack thereof—under the agreement that we entered. I urge that we amicably conclude our dealings by immediate refund of the $200.00 to which I am entitled.