I live in a townhome association that requires the use of this specific vendor for garage door replacements. The association pays 1/2 the cost and the homeowner pays 1/2, plus any extra work the homeowner may have done at the same time. I did research other vendors prior to having the door replaced to see how competitive the price would be. I believe the garage door was original (35 years old), but my garage door opener is 3 years old. The replacement work included door, springs, cables, tracks, weatherstripping and removal of old parts. One of the old cables had broken unexpectedly so I needed the door replaced if I wanted to be able to use it. I contacted IDC about replacing the door and was able to schedule the replacement. Initially they were not sure whether the required replacement door was in stock so there was a possibility I would have to wait three weeks. However, they called back the next day to tell me the door was in stock and the work was scheduled for the next week. <br /> Because I had heard about springs breaking in this neighborhood I inquired as to whether "better" than standard springs were an option. I was told that instead of springs rated at 10000 cycles, I could request springs rated at 20000 cycles for an additional $50. I asked whether written specs or a guarantee were provided so I would have something to show what I paid extra for, but this wasn't available. In my opinion, this is asking the customer (me) to take the risk to believe that the seller (IDC) really is providing the "better" product (20000 cycle springs) -- so I had to decide whether to pay the extra $50 for the better springs, which in the end I did request. <br /> On the day of the installation, the installer arrived on time. I asked to see the springs and he showed me two different sets of springs (a 10000 cycle set and a 20000 set). But there wasn't any labeling or paperwork to "prove" that I was getting better springs for the extra $50. After the installation, I was provided a general warranty card and a brochure on garage door safety and maintenance. I paid my 1/2 of the total cost plus $50 by check (see above, the association paid the other 1/2) but received neither an invoice describing the work done and components used, nor a receipt for my check. <br /> The installation itself went extremely well. The installer was very professional. The old door, components, and tracks needed to be taken down, the new tracks needed to be measured, cut, and attached to the garage, and then the new components assembled and installed. All this required several hours of installation time. Afterwards the installer cleaned up the garage. The new door looks great and much better than the old door. Based on the installation work, I would be very happy to use this company again and rate this experience with all A's. However, I was not happy with the company's lack of concern for providing me with complete documentation for what I was paying for (description of the materials purchased, what the extra $50 covered, guarantee related to purchasing "better" springs, receipt for the check I provided). I think even when customers have no other choice and are required to use a certain vendor, sellers ought to be willing to provide an invoice for the work, some kind of guarantee or even just information on "extras", and a receipt for payment made. Several weeks later I was able to get a copy of the invoice that the vendor had provided to the association for their 1/2 payment, which did list 20,000 cycles springs. Overall, I'm very happy with the installation work, but think that as the end-user customer, I should have received better documentation for this expense from IDC. <br /> <br /> <br />