Summarized, these are the major issues that lead to this negative report: <br /> Discovering JFK Construction?s workers? compensation insurance had lapsed following a serious injury accident by a subcontractor on our job site <br /> <ul> <li>~Non-compliance with standard building codes that lead to the county inspection failing on</li> <li>3 points (rail height, baluster spacing, center post strength) (see photo)</li> <li>~Number of days it took to complete the project (50 vs. 11 days) Much of this was</li> <li>due to the roofer?s accident, and delays with the painters when we insisted on insured workers.</li> <li>~Finished look/materials used--Offset of columns and the finish used to close in the</li> <li>tops (see photo) Trying to resolve this during the project with Mr. Katz was not pleasant or productive.</li> <li>~The overall manner our concerns were dealt with, and the long delays in responding to</li> <li>our calls and emails by the owner</li> </ul> <br /> Lessons learned: <br /> ~Request and VERIFY the certificate of insurance with the contractor?s insurance agent by calling. Don?t rely on statements of coverage in the contract, on the business card, or on Angie?s List. Our signed contract stated JFK had liability and Workers? Comp insurance. We later learned their Workers? Comp insurance had expired, and not recently. <br /> ~Don?t agree to a payment structure that strongly favors the contractor. In this case it left us little leverage to get them to complete the job. Eight (8) days into the project that took 50 days, JFK had $6426 of the total $6961. <br /> We ended up with a mostly nice looking structure (see photo), but the journey to get there was very stressful, and unfortunately involved a serious accident with one of their sub-contractors. Because the workman?s accident was very serious, and involved a 911 call and transport by Fire/EMS, we notified our insurance agent. He in turn advised us to request JFK?s certificate of insurance. They did respond with the certificate of the roofing sub-contractor and then his sub-contractor, but it took a couple of requests to <br /> get JFK?s. Once we got it, we discovered JFK had not had a workers? comp since 2009. I also verified this with Mr. Katz verbally <br /> when he came back to the job site after a 5 week absence. <br /> Another major problem was with our County inspection, which failed on 3 issues <br /> 1) Second story rail height was not to code and as specified <br /> in our contract (must always be 36? for safety reasons) <br /> 2) The distance between balusters was not to code?max. 4? (reuse of original rail) and potential problem was not caught or anticipated by JFK Construction. <br /> 3) Center post of railing not sturdy enough to meet code. I had alerted Mr. Katz to this potential problem in a phone conversation. We also learned the amount of the job was given incorrectly to the County resulting in <br /> a lower permit fee. Just too many discrepancies were becoming apparent and made <br /> us lose confidence in JFK. <br /> We had initially asked the project supervisor about the rail strength and didn?t feel it was taken seriously by being told ?don?t point it <br /> out to the inspector?. We later asked Fred about the post strength prior to the inspection and 2 bolts were added. We have been told by other folks in the construction industry that that post should have been secured through the roof and decking material and the <br /> roofing material wrapped up around it for a proper seal. It also resulted in additional perforations in our new rubber roof. (leaves the potential of water infiltration later, and resulting rot). This is important because the roof area can be accessed through a second story door and is not merely decorative. Another call back resulted, and changes had to be made to satisfy the code inspector. <br /> Mr. Katz only returned to the job site to collect the last payment. They did honor their Angie?s List coupon for $100 gift card on jobs <br /> over $5000, but did not honor the referral fee to the Harris?, who referred us to them. In fairness, the positives of the project were that our porch was restored to much the same look as prior to the demo (photo on the JFK website). Chuck, the project supervisor, and John, their carpenter were polite and pleasant to deal with. Their roofing sub, Jeff Freeman Roofing, was extremely professional and customer-focused. <br /> <strong>We wouldn?t hire JFK Construction again, nor recommend them to anyone.</strong> <br /> <br /> <em>July 2012 Update</em> <br /> The bead board ceiling installed by JFK has begun separating and needs tacked in a couple places. You can now see the wood structure behind it in 5-6 places. After sending a couple of emails with photos, we were finally able to reach them by phone and are awaiting a response. Mr. Katz indicated a 1 year warranty on all his company?s workmanship. <br /> <em>October 2012 Update</em> <br /> Fred Katz came out and looked at the ceiling. He said it was <br /> normal to have the separation but that he would paint it to make it less noticeable <br /> since you could see the sub-material now. He also agreed to use an exterior <br /> paint since interior was used the first time in error. Mr. Katz?s office called <br /> one afternoon several weeks later to say they would be out the next morning to <br /> paint and left a voice message. I called back to tell him that particular day <br /> that neither my husband nor myself were available to be here. He said we didn?t <br /> need to be. I said we preferred to be here and ANY other day would be fine. We <br /> have never heard from him again. <br /> Additionally, when we spoke, I asked if the painters he was sending were insured. He stated they were not. I asked if he had his workers? comp insurance reinstated yet, and he said ?no?. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />