Get matched with top egress window installers in your area

"It went well. Mr Davila was courteous and informed. He took care of the rotting wood and reinforced the fascias and other boards. He painted the area worked on with matching paint of my house. He left the area clean. I will call him again."

"Jacob was a very nice guy and didn’t pressure me into anything. He educated me on the process and showed me a good window. I am very happy with the project."

"Excellent. Robert Karnes was very professional and knowledgeable"

"Excellent, no problems. My car was new the first year I used the service and there has never been any damage during the transports. The men picking up and delivering the car have always been pleasant and cooperative. Both Ely and Guy at United Transport has been highly responsive to my needs. I would highly recommend this company."

"Be aware!- He overcharged us for materials and at the end of the job tried to charged us extra money for work done under the original contract or for repairs to damaged areas caused by his workers. We went to BBB arbitration and won the case against him and he got his BBB accreditation suspended. See below the decision of the BBB arbitrator in her own words: ***In review of the testimony from both parties and the evidence presented, the decision for this arbitration is as follows: Award: Consumer seeks a refund of $2,460 for overpayment of materials Concerns regarding the difference in the amounts should have been discussed and resolved prior to the final payment being remitted. Costs of materials as charged by a retailer to a business may or may not include discounts. Receipts obtained from the consumer from the retailers who sold Mr. Rinaldi of Dash Construction materials for the contracted job (brick/stone and windows) varies in amount from what Was actually charged to customer. Careful review of the testimony and evidence presented during the hearing was the compelling evidence of numerous examples of concerns with the credibility of Mr. Rinaldi with regards to providing transparent estimates, billing, and invoicing for materials and labor. As such, the intent of credibility and character of Mr. Rinaldi results in the decision to award the consumer's request for a refund in the amount of $2,460. Denial: Business seeks payment for additional work totaling $3,230 The existence of a contract may or may not involve revisions. Verbal conversations are enforceable When requirements of a contract are present. The payment in the amount of $66,288.00 for work Contracted was paid in full by the consumer. After final payment for the work contracted was received, Mr. Rinaldi invoiced the consumer for additional work completed. Outstanding payments for work done within the scope of the project should have been brought to the attention, discussed, and resolved prior to the final payment being requested and final payment being accepted. In addition, Mr. Rinaldi signed a waiver of lien for the consumer's mortgage holder, implying no additional charges were outstanding. The evidence and testimony provided by Mr. Rinaldi was not compelling to award $3,230 to include the Witness statements presented as evidence which lacked credibility.***"